Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Leidos Holdings, Inc.
How Leidos Holdings, Inc. stacks up
LDOS · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #994 of 1,669 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including LDOS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 3.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 0.3% vs peer median 11.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.9% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LDOS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LDOS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 3.4% | 8.5% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 0.3% | 11.1% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 5.9% | 4.8% | 54% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LDOS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 994 | 4.6B USD | 40 | 13 | |
| 994 | 1.0B CAD (≈$736M) | 40 | 63 | |
| 994 | 25.5B USD | 40 | 56 | |
| 994 | 732M AUD (≈$483M) | 40 | 66 | |
| 994 | 16.9B USD | 40 | 57 | |
| 1,011 | 74.9B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 39 | 46 | |
| 1,011 | 56.3B JPY (≈$383M) | 39 | 58 | |
| 1,011 | 128.5B JPY (≈$874M) | 39 | 45 | |
| 1,011 | 4.3B CNY (≈$595M) | 39 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score