Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CDRO · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #51 of 362 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 70
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including CDRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CDRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 319 reported | 0.05× | 0.99× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 348 reported | 0.46 | 1.14 | 93% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 362 reported | 1.47× | 1.47× | 50% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 96 | 89 | |
| 2 | 499M USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 141M USD | 95 | 30 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 95 | 89 | |
| 5 | 283M USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 47 | 1.0B USD | 71 | 37 | |
| 48 | 299M USD | 71 | 82 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 49 | 1.2B USD | 71 | 54 |
| 50 | 582M USD | 71 | 63 |
| 51 | 395M USD | 70 | 40 |
| 52 | 11.5B USD | 69 | 78 |
| 53 | 593M USD | 69 | 40 |
| 54 | 3.6B USD | 68 | 59 |
| 55 | 1.3B USD | 68 | 65 |