Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
How Cadence Design Systems, Inc. stacks up
CDNS · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,093 of 1,667 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CDNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 1.9% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDNS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 1.6% | 2.3% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 2.4% | 4.3% | 34% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 1.9% | 2.7% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 7.7% | 33.4% | 9% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDNS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,093 | 5.3B CNY (≈$738M) | 34 | 59 | |
| 1,093 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 34 | 65 | |
| 1,093 | 28.7B USD | 34 | 47 | |
| 1,093 | 10.5B AUD (≈$7.0B) | 34 | 65 | |
| 1,093 | 89.2B USD | 34 | 59 | |
| 1,093 | 6.7B USD | 34 | 48 | |
| 1,093 | 7.6B USD | 34 | 69 | |
| 1,109 | 20.0B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 33 | 68 | |
| 1,109 | 11.7B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 33 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score