Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CDNS · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,046 of 1,698 · scores higher than 38% of peers · safety percentile 38
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)169 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CDNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CDNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.39× | 0.26× | 41% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.13 | 0.84 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.74× | 1.83× | 46% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,042 | 20.9B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 39 | 26 | |
| 1,043 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 39.4B TWD (≈$1.2B) |
| 39 |
| 59 |
| 1,044 | 718M AUD (≈$474M) | 39 | 29 |
| 1,045 | 34.0B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 38 | 32 |
| 1,046 | 89.2B USD | 38 | 59 |
| 1,047 | 192M HKD (≈$25M) | 38 | 45 |
| 1,048 | 39.2B USD | 38 | 51 |
| 1,049 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 38 | 36 |
| 1,050 | 89.1B CNY (≈$12.5B) | 38 | 20 |