Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CCEP · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #659 of 802 · scores higher than 18% of peers · safety percentile 18
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CCEP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CCEP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 1.39× | 0.44× | 15% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.46 | 0.32 | 33% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 0.89× | 1.53× | 18% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 655 | 3.6B CNY (≈$504M) | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 68 |
| 656 | 114.2B MXN (≈$6.2B) | 18 | 57 |
| 657 | 166.2B KRW (≈$120M) | 18 | 41 |
| 658 | 2.71T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 18 | 52 |
| 659 | 49.0B USD | 18 | 49 |
| 660 | 5.4B SAR (≈$1.5B) | 18 | 47 |
| 661 | 5.1B CNY (≈$718M) | 18 | 11 |
| 662 | 24.66T IDR (≈$1.5B) | 17 | 64 |
| 663 | 426M USD | 17 | 48 |