Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
How Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC stacks up
CCEP · against 41 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #24 of 42 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CCEP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 8.7%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CCEP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CCEP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | 4.6% | 4.3% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | 6.6% | 7.4% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 41 reported | 17.9% | 19.6% | 45% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CCEP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.1B EUR (≈$30.9B) | 79 | 51 | |
| 2 | 40.7B USD | 75 | 66 | |
| 3 | 22.1B GBP (≈$28.7B) | 71 | 46 | |
| 4 | 70.1B USD | 67 | 47 | |
| 5 | 25.2B USD | 65 | 65 | |
| 19 | 43.3B USD | 42 | 63 | |
| 19 | 33.7B USD | 42 | 51 | |
| 22 | 287.6B BRL (≈$51.8B) | 41 | 39 | |
| 22 | 37.1B USD | 41 | 48 | |
| 24 | 49.0B USD | 38 | 49 | |
| 25 | 503.8B HKD (≈$64.5B) | 34 | 73 | |
| 25 | 80.1B CAD (≈$58.5B) | 34 | 47 | |
| 27 | 83.1B USD | 32 | 44 | |
| 28 | 47.3B USD | 30 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score