Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mondelez International, Inc.
How Mondelez International, Inc. stacks up
MDLZ · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #540 of 799 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including MDLZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 72% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.7% vs peer median 6.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 8.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MDLZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MDLZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 4.2% | 4.5% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 5.9% | 8.9% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 3.1% | 6.3% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 31.9% | 54.4% | 26% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MDLZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 540 | 19.0B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 32 | 53 | |
| 540 | 6.6B TWD (≈$205M) | 32 | 41 | |
| 540 | 5.3B CNY (≈$742M) | 32 | 44 | |
| 540 | 24.5B USD | 32 | 52 | |
| 540 | 83.1B USD | 32 | 44 | |
| 540 | 217.1B CHF (≈$249.7B) | 32 | 35 | |
| 540 | 5.0B USD | 32 | 50 | |
| 548 | 6.5B CNY (≈$906M) | 31 | 60 | |
| 548 | 2.9B CNY (≈$400M) | 31 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score