Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CBRE · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #555 of 751 · scores higher than 26% of peers · safety percentile 26
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CBRE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CBRE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 1.18× | 0.82× | 29% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.23 | 0.69 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 1.14× | 1.20× | 47% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 551 | 6.2B CAD (≈$4.5B) | 27 | 39 | |
| 552 | 6.7B USD | 27 | 28 | |
| 553 | 70M HKD (≈$9M) | 26 | 10 | |
| 554 | 2.1B CAD (≈$1.6B) | 26 | 44 | |
| 555 | 39.2B USD | 26 | 56 | |
| 556 | 4.6B EUR (≈$5.1B) | 26 | 57 | |
| 557 | 181M EUR (≈$199M) | 26 | 46 | |
| 558 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 26 | 46 | |
| 559 | 26.1B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 26 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score