Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Callaway Golf Company
How Callaway Golf Company stacks up
CALY · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #188 of 356 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CALY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -9.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CALY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CALY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.5% | 4.3% | 65% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 8.7% | 8.4% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 11.9% | 5.3% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 76.0% | 35.8% | 74% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CALY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 180 | 1.4B USD | 46 | 38 | |
| 185 | 6.1B USD | 45 | 53 | |
| 185 | 3.0B USD | 45 | 45 | |
| 185 | 193M USD | 45 | 34 | |
| 188 | 2.8B USD | 44 | 55 | |
| 188 | 57.2B USD | 44 | 50 | |
| 188 | 2.5B USD | 44 | 43 | |
| 188 | 3.2B USD | 44 | 65 | |
| 188 | 1.1B USD | 44 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score