Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tripadvisor, Inc.
How Tripadvisor, Inc. stacks up
TRIP · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #863 of 1,553 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including TRIP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 80% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.1% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRIP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRIP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 0.0% | 4.4% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 9.5% | 8.8% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 12.1% | 6.1% | 75% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 60.5% | 57.2% | 52% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRIP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 863 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 44 | 58 | |
| 863 | 2.5B USD | 44 | 43 | |
| 863 | 1.5B SEK (≈$147M) | 44 | 60 | |
| 863 | 3.2B USD | 44 | 65 | |
| 863 | 1.1B USD | 44 | 55 | |
| 878 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 43 | 37 | |
| 878 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 43 | 23 | |
| 878 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 43 | 52 | |
| 878 | 23.8B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 43 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score