Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cardinal Health, Inc.
How Cardinal Health, Inc. stacks up
CAH · against 55 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #27 of 56 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score10 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CAH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.7% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 14.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 56 reported | 14.2% | 9.1% | 73% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 12.7% | 12.2% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 56 reported | 7.4% | 7.0% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.7B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 3 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 4 | 43.30T KRW (≈$31.2B) | 86 | 68 | |
| 4 | 56.0B USD | 86 | 39 | |
| 22 | 2.67T INR (≈$32.1B) | 60 | 68 | |
| 24 | 50.2B USD | 58 | 49 | |
| 24 | 52.9B USD | 58 | 57 | |
| 24 | 45.6B CHF (≈$52.4B) | 58 | 55 | |
| 27 | 58.6B USD | 56 | 52 | |
| 28 | 108.6B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 28 | 4.25T INR (≈$51.0B) | 55 | 70 | |
| 30 | 100.2B USD | 54 | 57 | |
| 30 | 32.8B USD | 54 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score