Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cardinal Health, Inc.
How Cardinal Health, Inc. stacks up
CAH · against 1,216 other Healthcare companies
Growth
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #530 of 1,217 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score122 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CAH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.7% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 14.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,243 reported | 14.2% | 6.1% | 70% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 682 reported | 12.7% | 9.7% | 54% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,192 reported | 7.4% | 5.8% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 3 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 530 | 3.3B CNY (≈$458M) | 56 | 49 | |
| 530 | 2.57T JPY (≈$17.5B) | 56 | 62 | |
| 530 | 73.8B JPY (≈$502M) | 56 | 62 | |
| 530 | 157.8B INR (≈$1.9B) | 56 | 64 | |
| 530 | 58.6B USD | 56 | 52 | |
| 530 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 56 | 58 | |
| 530 | 291M EUR (≈$320M) | 56 | 54 | |
| 530 | 879M USD | 56 | 36 | |
| 530 | 5.8B USD | 56 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score