Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Black Hills Corporation
How Black Hills Corporation stacks up
BKH · against 89 other Utilities companies listed in US-listed
Growth
34/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #84 of 90 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including BKH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.8% vs peer median 2.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.5% vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BKH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BKH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 91 reported | 2.5% | 7.4% | 16% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 0.5% | 2.8% | 39% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 89 reported | -3.8% | 4.0% | 11% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BKH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 3 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1.5B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 98 | 77 | |
| 80 | 273M USD | 38 | 30 | |
| 81 | Unavailable | 37 | 69 | |
| 81 | 10.1B USD | 37 | 46 | |
| 83 | 439M USD | 35 | 63 | |
| 84 | 6.3B USD | 34 | 38 | |
| 85 | 232M USD | 32 | 21 | |
| 86 | 55.8B USD | 27 | 34 | |
| 87 | 4.1B USD | 26 | 43 | |
| 88 | 5.7B USD | 20 | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score