Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Black Hills Corporation
How Black Hills Corporation stacks up
BKH · against 351 other Utilities companies
Growth
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #231 of 352 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including BKH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.8% vs peer median 2.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.5% vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BKH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BKH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | 2.5% | 2.5% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 284 reported | 0.5% | 1.6% | 47% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 351 reported | -3.8% | 2.0% | 24% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BKH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 228 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 35 | 39 | |
| 231 | 10.3B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 34 | 74 | |
| 231 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 34 | 43 | |
| 231 | 77.3B TRY (≈$2.3B) | 34 | 47 | |
| 231 | 6.3B USD | 34 | 38 | |
| 235 | 47.0B CNY (≈$6.6B) | 33 | 48 | |
| 235 | 126.6B CNY (≈$17.7B) | 33 | 45 | |
| 235 | 606.3B INR (≈$7.3B) | 33 | 48 | |
| 238 | 16.5B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 32 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score