Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BILI · against 508 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #268 of 509 · scores higher than 47% of peers · safety percentile 47
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)50 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including BILI · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BILI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 468 reported | 0.60× | 0.40× | 39% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 497 reported | 0.65 | 0.61 | 47% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 498 reported | 1.32× | 1.37× | 49% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B KRW (≈$18M) | 100 | 26 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 5 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 264 | 95.4B KRW (≈$69M) | 48 | 65 | |
| 265 | 1.2B USD | 48 | 24 | |
| 266 | 32.0B THB (≈$895M) | 48 | 56 | |
| 267 | 23.8B USD | 48 | 61 | |
| 268 | 5.5B USD | 47 | 62 | |
| 269 | 289.2B IDR (≈$18M) | 47 | 47 | |
| 270 | 52M AUD (≈$34M) | 47 | 25 | |
| 271 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 47 | 74 | |
| 272 | 3.8B NZD (≈$2.3B) | 47 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score