Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BILI · against 95 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #48 of 96 · scores higher than 51% of peers · safety percentile 47
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including BILI · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BILI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 89 reported | 0.60× | 0.52× | 42% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 92 reported | 0.65 | 0.58 | 46% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 93 reported | 1.32× | 1.22× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 93.9B MXN (≈$5.1B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 4 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 65 | |
| 5 | 32.0B HKD (≈$4.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 44 | 5.7B EUR (≈$6.3B) | 52 | 64 | |
| 45 | 46.5B CNY (≈$6.5B) | 51 | 42 | |
| 46 | 2.7B EUR (≈$2.9B) | 50 | 58 | |
| 47 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 50 | 47 | |
| 48 | 5.5B USD | 47 | 62 | |
| 49 | 166.5B TRY (≈$5.0B) | 46 | 76 | |
| 50 | 4.1B USD | 46 | 59 | |
| 51 | 12.74T KRW (≈$9.2B) | 46 | 70 | |
| 52 | 4.5B USD | 44 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score