Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc.
How Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. stacks up
BHR-PB · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
25/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #159 of 180 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including BHR-PB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- The loss per share widened. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 72% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -2.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: -3.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BHR-PB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BHR-PB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | -3.8% | 5.9% | 13% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | Not reported | 13.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | -2.1% | 4.8% | 17% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BHR-PB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.5B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.3B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 558M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 12.1B USD | 98 | 48 | |
| 4 | 35.3B USD | 98 | 44 | |
| 155 | 2.4B USD | 27 | 52 | |
| 156 | 650M USD | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score