Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BF-A · against 88 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #10 of 89 · scores higher than 90% of peers · safety percentile 78
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including BF-A · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BF-A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 88 reported | 0.62× | 0.60× | 49% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 86 reported | 0.32 | 0.33 | 52% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 83 reported | 3.26× | 1.25× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 2 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 4 | 55.6B CNY (≈$7.8B) | 83 | 57 | |
| 5 | 118.9B CNY (≈$16.7B) | 83 | 61 | |
| 6 | 1.77T JPY (≈$12.0B) | 82 | 57 | |
| 7 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 82 | 71 | |
| 8 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 82 | 81 | |
| 9 | 7.2B USD | 80 | 72 | |
| 10 | 13.7B USD | 78 | 59 | |
| 11 | 1.16T JPY (≈$7.9B) | 76 | 56 | |
| 12 | 1.38T INR (≈$16.6B) | 75 | 66 | |
| 13 | 3.41T JPY (≈$23.2B) | 74 | 58 | |
| 14 | 7.8B USD | 71 | 83 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score