Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to KE Holdings Inc.
How KE Holdings Inc. stacks up
BEKE · against 49 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #32 of 50 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including BEKE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Real Estate peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -25.2% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.2% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 84% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 16.0% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BEKE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BEKE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 50 reported | 1.2% | 4.4% | 18% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 42 reported | -25.2% | 24.8% | 7% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 49 reported | 16.0% | 5.1% | 92% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BEKE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 2 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 2 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 15.2B USD | 97 | 66 | |
| 28 | 12.3B GBP (≈$16.0B) | 55 | 41 | |
| 29 | 4.28T JPY (≈$29.1B) | 54 | 47 | |
| 29 | 16.8B USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 31 | 37.8B USD | 53 | 45 | |
| 32 | 19.3B USD | 52 | 54 | |
| 33 | 1.75T INR (≈$21.1B) | 51 | 41 | |
| 33 | 26.9B USD | 51 | 78 | |
| 35 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 35 | 19.6B USD | 50 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score