Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ArrowMark Financial Corp.
How ArrowMark Financial Corp. stacks up
BANX · against 48 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
74/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #13 of 49 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including BANX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.1% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.2% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 92% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 38.5% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BANX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BANX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 52 reported | 6.2% | -2.1% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 34 reported | 5.1% | -0.8% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 41 reported | 38.5% | 2.4% | 90% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BANX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 2 | 956M HKD (≈$122M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 4 | 249M USD | 96 | 31 | |
| 5 | 370M USD | 92 | 85 | |
| 9 | 372M USD | 88 | 35 | |
| 10 | 505M AUD (≈$334M) | 82 | 55 | |
| 11 | 773M HKD (≈$99M) | 81 | 61 | |
| 12 | 4.5B THB (≈$127M) | 79 | 68 | |
| 13 | 190M USD | 74 | 67 | |
| 14 | 3.8B SEK (≈$376M) | 68 | 49 | |
| 15 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 56 | 84 | |
| 16 | 113M USD | 51 | 68 | |
| 17 | 6.5B THB (≈$182M) | 48 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score