Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TROOPS, Inc.
How TROOPS, Inc. stacks up
TROO · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #14 of 367 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including TROO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 92% of peers. Revenue growth: 69.7% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 64.0% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TROO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TROO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 69.7% | 7.4% | 92% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | Not reported | 9.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 64.0% | 10.0% | 96% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TROO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 11 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 14 | 6.7B SEK (≈$667M) | 96 | 74 | |
| 14 | 78M ZAR (≈$4M) | 96 | 78 | |
| 14 | 1.3B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 14 | 249M USD | 96 | 31 | |
| 18 | 45.3B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 95 | 40 | |
| 18 | 24.3B USD | 95 | 67 | |
| 18 | 1.4B USD | 95 | ||
| 18 | 572M GBP (≈$743M) | 95 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score