Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BABA · against 8 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #2 of 9 · scores higher than 88% of peers · safety percentile 65
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)1 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including BABA · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BABA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 8 reported | 0.24× | 0.84× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 9 reported | 0.46 | 0.56 | 63% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 9 reported | 1.36× | 1.17× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 137.5B EUR (≈$151.2B) | 92 | 70 | |
| 2 | 249.7B USD | 65 | 46 | |
| 3 | 151.4B USD | 56 | 61 | |
| 4 | 197.9B EUR (≈$217.7B) | 47 | 53 | |
| 5 | 228.5B USD | 42 | 40 | |
| 6 | 174.8B EUR (≈$192.3B) | 42 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score