Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TM · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #913 of 1,585 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including TM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity and current ratio than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 1.15× | 0.50× | 24% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.34 | 0.56 | 71% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.17× | 1.48× | 34% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 909 | 12.1B USD | 43 | 57 | |
| 910 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.8B CNY (≈$252M) |
| 43 |
| 21 |
| 911 | 3.1B CNY (≈$437M) | 43 | 38 |
| 912 | 3.1B CNY (≈$441M) | 42 | 32 |
| 913 | 228.5B USD | 42 | 40 |
| 914 | 8.2B AUD (≈$5.4B) | 42 | 58 |
| 915 | 12.2B USD | 42 | 63 |
| 916 | 1.7B USD | 42 | 60 |
| 917 | 13.9B THB (≈$389M) | 42 | 42 |