Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alibaba Group Holding Limited
How Alibaba Group Holding Limited stacks up
BABA · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #241 of 356 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including BABA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -17.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.6% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BABA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BABA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 2.7% | 5.9% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -17.9% | 6.2% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 5.6% | 4.1% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BABA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 237 | 15.2B USD | 43 | 36 | |
| 238 | 332.9B USD | 42 | 45 | |
| 238 | 18.3B USD | 42 | 55 | |
| 238 | 1.8B USD | 42 | 46 | |
| 241 | 249.7B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 241 | 2.4B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 241 | 4.6B USD | 41 | 44 | |
| 241 | 5.1B USD | 41 | 59 | |
| 245 | 5.9B USD | 40 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score