Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AZZ Inc.
How AZZ Inc. stacks up
AZZ · against 503 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #248 of 504 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including AZZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.3% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AZZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AZZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 498 reported | 4.7% | 4.4% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 509 reported | 7.8% | 7.9% | 49% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 205 reported | 4.1% | 4.2% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 33.2% | 42.0% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AZZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 244 | 29.4B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 57 | 65 | |
| 244 | 413.8B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 57 | 40 | |
| 244 | 3.5B USD | 57 | 40 | |
| 244 | 6.2B CHF (≈$7.1B) | 57 | 50 | |
| 248 | 4.2B USD | 56 | 55 | |
| 248 | 3.0B USD | 56 | 51 | |
| 248 | 2.8B GBP (≈$3.6B) | 56 | 57 | |
| 248 | 491.4B INR (≈$5.9B) | 56 | 79 | |
| 252 | 640.6B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 55 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score