Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AZO · against 54 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #48 of 55 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 9
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including AZO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AZO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 50 reported | Not reported | 0.72× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 54 reported | 0.40 | 0.83 | 79% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 53 reported | 0.90× | 1.29× | 21% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 2 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 3 | 40.6B USD | 89 | 61 | |
| 4 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 87 | 75 | |
| 5 | 3.73T INR (≈$44.8B) | 87 | 64 | |
| 44 | 35.5B CAD (≈$25.9B) | 12 | 51 | |
| 45 | 77.5B USD | 10 | 26 | |
| 46 | 34.0B USD | 9 | 52 | |
| 47 | 39.3B USD | 9 | 53 | |
| 48 | 51.5B USD | 9 | 50 | |
| 49 | 72.8B USD | 7 | 50 | |
| 50 | 42.8B USD | 7 | 54 | |
| 51 | 83.8B USD | 6 | 52 | |
| 52 | 81.9B USD | 3 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score