Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ATS Corporation
How ATS Corporation stacks up
ATS · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #803 of 2,394 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score240 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ATS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 1.8% | 3.8% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 7.9% | 7.0% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 7.9% | 3.7% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 68.4% | 50.5% | 64% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 803 | 261.9B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 66 | 73 | |
| 803 | 534M MYR (≈$117M) | 66 | 37 | |
| 803 | 403.6B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 66 | 48 | |
| 803 | 248.8B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 66 | 77 | |
| 803 | 1.9B USD | 66 | 54 | |
| 803 | 8.9B CAD (≈$6.5B) | 66 | 66 | |
| 803 | 23.0B INR (≈$276M) | 66 | 69 | |
| 803 | 1.9B GBP (≈$2.5B) | 66 | 52 | |
| 803 | 553M USD | 66 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score