Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ATS · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,751 of 2,437 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)243 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ATS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ATS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.78× | 0.41× | 31% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.12 | 0.61 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 1.63× | 1.62× | 51% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1,747 | 71.0B NOK (≈$6.7B) | 28 | 55 | |
| 1,748 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.5B CNY (≈$635M) |
| 28 |
| 38 |
| 1,749 | 6.2B CNY (≈$868M) | 28 | 62 |
| 1,750 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 28 | 58 |
| 1,751 | 1.9B USD | 28 | 54 |
| 1,752 | 4.9B USD | 28 | 32 |
| 1,753 | 18.8B TWD (≈$582M) | 28 | 63 |
| 1,754 | 18.9B USD | 28 | 27 |
| 1,755 | 2.0B CNY (≈$282M) | 28 | 39 |