Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ATO · against 54 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #37 of 55 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including ATO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
| Metric | ATO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | 4.8% | 4.7% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | 6.7% | 7.8% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 37 reported | -6.9% | -4.8% | 36% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 52.0% | 48.4% | 57% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 91 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.7B) | 83 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2.96T JPY (≈$20.1B) | 82 | 48 | |
| 4 | 27.0B EUR (≈$29.7B) | 76 | 63 | |
| 5 | 3.12T INR (≈$37.4B) | 73 | 62 | |
| 33 | 22.0B USD | 38 | 44 | |
| 33 | 28.0B USD | 38 | 46 | |
| 35 | 30.5B USD | 37 | 45 | |
| 36 | 19.4B EUR (≈$21.4B) | 36 | 52 | |
| 37 | 29.4B USD | 33 | 57 | |
| 38 | 49.2B USD | 32 | 38 | |
| 39 | 21.3B EUR (≈$23.4B) | 30 | 36 | |
| 40 | 37.6B USD | 29 | 43 | |
| 41 | 52.0B USD | 28 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score