Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CNP · against 358 other Utilities companies
Ranked #222 of 359 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CNP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
| Metric | CNP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | 4.0% | 5.0% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 7.4% | 8.6% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | -9.6% | -1.8% | 17% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 41.8% | 64.7% | 22% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 218 | 30.6B USD | 39 | 47 | |
| 218 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 27.9B USD |
| 39 |
| 41 |
| 218 | 97.0B EUR (≈$106.6B) | 39 | 49 |
| 222 | 22.0B USD | 38 | 44 |
| 222 | 28.0B USD | 38 | 46 |
| 222 | 5.4B USD | 38 | 77 |
| 225 | 4.6B EUR (≈$5.0B) | 37 | 43 |
| 225 | 30.5B USD | 37 | 45 |
| 225 | 131.1B THB (≈$3.7B) | 37 | 38 |