Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ATI Inc.
How ATI Inc. stacks up
ATI · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,141 of 2,400 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including ATI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 15.4% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 4.6% | 4.4% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 15.4% | 7.1% | 61% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 4.5% | 4.2% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,141 | 45.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 52 | 40 | |
| 1,141 | 137.5B JPY (≈$935M) | 52 | 70 | |
| 1,141 | 462.2B JPY (≈$3.1B) | 52 | 66 | |
| 1,141 | 8.7B EUR (≈$9.6B) | 52 | 55 | |
| 1,141 | 24.6B USD | 52 | 49 | |
| 1,141 | 27.9B INR (≈$335M) | 52 | 68 | |
| 1,141 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 52 | 51 | |
| 1,141 | 12.8B CAD (≈$9.4B) | 52 | 47 | |
| 1,141 | 2.0B USD | 52 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score