Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Autohome Inc.
How Autohome Inc. stacks up
ATHM · against 125 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #75 of 126 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score14 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including ATHM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Communication Services peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 67% of peers. Return on assets: 0.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 61% of peers. Operating margin: 11.9% vs peer median 8.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATHM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATHM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 117 reported | Not reported | 7.5% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 125 reported | 11.9% | 10.1% | 56% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 122 reported | 0.8% | 3.1% | 28% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 119 reported | 3.7% | 6.7% | 37% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 126 reported | 74.0% | 49.2% | 80% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATHM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 385.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 98 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2.9B USD | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 61 | |
| 5 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 95 | 67 | |
| 70 | 673.4B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 51 | 63 | |
| 72 | 1.7B USD | 50 | 54 | |
| 73 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 49 | 54 | |
| 74 | 17.5B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 48 | 51 | |
| 75 | 2.3B USD | 47 | 55 | |
| 76 | 2.5B AUD (≈$1.6B) | 46 | 42 | |
| 76 | 1.7B USD | 46 | 41 | |
| 78 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 45 | 64 | |
| 79 | 20.8B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 43 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score