Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to A10 Networks, Inc.
How A10 Networks, Inc. stacks up
ATEN · against 480 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #249 of 481 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ATEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.5% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATEN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 474 reported | 2.4% | 2.4% | 50% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 485 reported | 4.1% | 4.6% | 45% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 3.5% | 3.2% | 51% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 476 reported | 13.5% | 32.6% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATEN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 242 | 1.5B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 50 | 64 | |
| 242 | 1.3B CHF (≈$1.5B) | 50 | 69 | |
| 249 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 49 | 54 | |
| 249 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 49 | 39 | |
| 249 | 1.8B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 249 | 3.1B USD | 49 | 67 | |
| 249 | 989M EUR (≈$1.1B) | 49 | 54 | |
| 254 | 84.1B THB (≈$2.4B) | 48 | 31 | |
| 254 | 2.7B USD | 48 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score