Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ASML Holding N.V.
How ASML Holding N.V. stacks up
ASML · against 12 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #7 of 13 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including ASML · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 29.5% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: 15.6% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 79% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 15.6% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASML, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASML | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 13 reported | 15.6% | 15.6% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 12 reported | 29.5% | 39.2% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 13 reported | 15.6% | 12.1% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASML| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 421.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 994.08T KRW (≈$715.7B) | 96 | 81 | |
| 3 | 1.07T USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 5 | 790.0B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 6 | 382.5B USD | 76 | 55 | |
| 7 | 598.2B USD | 71 | 60 | |
| 8 | 1429.37T KRW (≈$1.03T) | 57 | 76 | |
| 8 | 303.1B USD | 57 | 58 | |
| 8 | 1.08T USD | 57 | 84 | |
| 8 | 406.0B USD | 57 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score