Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aptiv PLC
How Aptiv PLC stacks up
APTV · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #236 of 362 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score20 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including APTV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 72% of peers. Return on assets: 1.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 5.9% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.2% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APTV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APTV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | 7.2% | 9.5% | 40% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 362 reported | 5.9% | 7.1% | 46% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | 1.2% | 4.1% | 28% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 315 reported | 5.2% | 11.8% | 32% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 363 reported | 19.3% | 36.0% | 21% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APTV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 11.3B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 1 | 6.8B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 228 | 3.1B USD | 40 | 45 | |
| 233 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score