Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Apollo Global Management, Inc.
How Apollo Global Management, Inc. stacks up
APO · against 22 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 23 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including APO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Financial Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 80% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 14.1% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 25 reported | 2.5% | 3.6% | 17% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 18 reported | Not reported | 5.7% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 19 reported | 14.1% | 4.3% | 89% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 24 reported | 30.0% | 22.3% | 57% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.0B GBP (≈$33.9B) | 93 | 73 | |
| 2 | 128.0B USD | 76 | 61 | |
| 3 | 43.8B USD | 74 | 57 | |
| 4 | 49.8B USD | 71 | 55 | |
| 5 | 46.6B USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 6 | 67.1B USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 7 | 70.0B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 8 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 43 | 60 | |
| 9 | 96.0B USD | 38 | 48 | |
| 10 | 197.1B BRL (≈$35.5B) | 36 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score