Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Autoliv, Inc.
How Autoliv, Inc. stacks up
ALV · against 205 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #132 of 206 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score30 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ALV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -5.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 206 reported | 5.9% | 5.8% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 177 reported | -5.7% | 6.3% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 205 reported | 4.3% | 6.1% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 3 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 98 | 41 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 128 | 53.8B HKD (≈$6.9B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 128 | 1.46T JPY (≈$9.9B) | 49 | 62 | |
| 128 | 14.0B USD | 49 | 47 | |
| 128 | 7.5B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 132 | 8.6B USD | 48 | 55 | |
| 132 | 147.3B MXN (≈$8.0B) | 48 | 73 | |
| 134 | 12.2B USD | 47 | 60 | |
| 134 | 4.4B USD | 47 | 45 | |
| 136 | 5.1B USD | 46 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score