Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alta Equipment Group Inc.
How Alta Equipment Group Inc. stacks up
ALTG-PA · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
25/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,789 of 2,400 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including ALTG-PA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- The loss per share widened. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 7.1%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 72% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.8% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALTG-PA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALTG-PA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | -1.8% | 4.4% | 28% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | Not reported | 7.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 1.8% | 4.2% | 40% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALTG-PA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,789 | 98.3B CNY (≈$13.8B) | 25 | 57 | |
| 1,789 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score