Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
How Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. stacks up
ALH · against 304 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #212 of 305 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score42 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ALH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 303 reported | 4.1% | 5.5% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 309 reported | 7.0% | 9.6% | 30% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | 5.8% | 6.3% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 11.4% | 43.9% | 12% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 205 | 7.9B USD | 42 | 26 | |
| 209 | 5.4B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 209 | 5.6B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 209 | 4.7B USD | 41 | 61 | |
| 212 | 4.4B USD | 40 | 45 | |
| 212 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 40 | 64 | |
| 214 | 653.6B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 39 | 37 | |
| 214 | 7.7B USD | 39 | 42 | |
| 214 | 5.1B USD | 39 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score