Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alico, Inc.
How Alico, Inc. stacks up
ALCO · against 806 other Consumer Defensive companies
Growth
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #683 of 807 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score81 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including ALCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 100% of peers. Revenue growth: -61.4% vs peer median 2.8%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -24.8% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ALCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ALCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 813 reported | -61.4% | 2.8% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 595 reported | Not reported | 1.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 801 reported | -24.8% | 3.7% | 1% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ALCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 82.5B JPY (≈$561M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2.4B CNY (≈$329M) | 99 | 29 | |
| 683 | 261.2B KRW (≈$188M) | 15 | 45 | |
| 683 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score