Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AGNT · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #620 of 751 · scores higher than 17% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including AGNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AGNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | Not reported | 0.82× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 2.06 | 0.69 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 1.51× | 1.20× | 59% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 616 | 681M USD | 18 | 52 | |
| 617 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.2B AUD (≈$811M) |
| 18 |
| 47 |
| 618 | 3.0B CAD (≈$2.2B) | 18 | 46 |
| 619 | 81.4B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 18 | 46 |
| 620 | 655M USD | 17 | 23 |
| 621 | 1.2B USD | 17 | 21 |
| 622 | 480M USD | 17 | 42 |
| 623 | 3.2B HKD (≈$406M) | 17 | 11 |
| 624 | 1.2B USD | 17 | 29 |