Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
How Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation stacks up
AGM · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #194 of 367 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including AGM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.4% vs peer median 10.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 9.7% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.9% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AGM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AGM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 8.9% | 7.4% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 9.4% | 9.9% | 49% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 9.7% | 10.0% | 49% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AGM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 190 | 391.0B SEK (≈$39.1B) | 48 | 57 | |
| 190 | 709M USD | 48 | 32 | |
| 190 | 4.9B USD | 48 | 38 | |
| 190 | 6.5B THB (≈$182M) | 48 | 56 | |
| 194 | 2.2B USD | 47 | 24 | |
| 194 | 19.0B CAD (≈$13.9B) | 47 | 60 | |
| 194 | 11.7B THB (≈$328M) | 47 | 53 | |
| 197 | 14.7B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 46 | 76 | |
| 197 | 5.5B EUR (≈$6.0B) | 46 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score