Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AerCap Holdings N.V.
How AerCap Holdings N.V. stacks up
AER · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
71/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #65 of 473 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including AER · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -3.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.1% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Earnings yield: 13.7% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AER, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AER | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 12.0% | 3.0% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 8.1% | 6.3% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | -3.0% | 3.3% | 17% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 76.9% | 32.3% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AER| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 60 | 1.3B USD | 73 | 61 | |
| 60 | 54.8B USD | 73 | 49 | |
| 60 | 28.3B USD | 73 | 64 | |
| 64 | 7.8B USD | 72 | 82 | |
| 65 | 24.7B USD | 71 | 61 | |
| 65 | 10.4B USD | 71 | 48 | |
| 65 | 6.1B USD | 71 | 62 | |
| 65 | 591M USD | 71 | 73 | |
| 69 | 2.5B USD | 70 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score