Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
How Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation stacks up
BAH · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #684 of 2,394 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including BAH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 85% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BAH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BAH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 7.4% | 3.8% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 8.4% | 7.0% | 58% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 10.8% | 3.7% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 12.0% | 50.5% | 9% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BAH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 684 | 227.2B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 71 | 55 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score