Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ADS-TEC Energy PLC
How ADS-TEC Energy PLC stacks up
ADSE · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #422 of 473 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including ADSE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -4.3% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADSE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADSE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | Not reported | 3.0% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | -6.8% | 6.3% | 8% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | Not reported | 3.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | Not reported | 32.3% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADSE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 419 | 725M USD | 12 | 46 | |
| 419 | 4.9B USD | 12 | 32 | |
| 422 | 178M USD | 9 | 34 | |
| 422 | 3.2B USD | 9 | 32 | |
| 422 | 684M USD | 9 | 10 | |
| 422 | 334M USD | 9 | 30 | |
| 422 | 1.3B USD | 9 | 48 | |
| 422 | 6.3B USD | 9 | 47 | |
| 422 | 5.7B USD | 9 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score