Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AECOM
How AECOM stacks up
ACM · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
19/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,933 of 2,400 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including ACM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 19?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -51.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 77% of peers. Revenue growth: -4.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.3% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | -4.2% | 4.4% | 23% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | -51.7% | 7.1% | 9% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 3.3% | 4.2% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,933 | 42.6B JPY (≈$290M) | 19 | 57 | |
| 1,933 | 241.7B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 19 | 57 | |
| 1,933 | 16.1B EUR (≈$17.8B) | 19 | 36 | |
| 1,933 | 2.05T JPY (≈$13.9B) | 19 | 45 | |
| 1,933 | 8.5B USD | 19 | 31 | |
| 1,933 | 27.7B BRL (≈$5.0B) | 19 | 38 | |
| 1,933 | 378M CHF (≈$434M) | 19 | 29 | |
| 1,933 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.8B) | 19 | 39 | |
| 1,933 | 265M EUR (≈$291M) | 19 | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score