Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AECOM
How AECOM stacks up
ACM · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
44/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #231 of 473 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score89 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ACM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.0% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 4.3% | 3.0% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 8.4% | 6.3% | 71% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 2.4% | 3.3% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 25.7% | 32.3% | 42% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 222 | 3.3B USD | 45 | 57 | |
| 222 | 10.2B USD | 45 | 28 | |
| 222 | 180.3B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 222 | 1.9B USD | 45 | 33 | |
| 231 | 8.5B USD | 44 | 31 | |
| 231 | 15.6B USD | 44 | 46 | |
| 231 | 2.0B USD | 44 | 55 | |
| 231 | 2.3B USD | 44 | 58 | |
| 231 | 91.3B USD | 44 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score