Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
How C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. stacks up
CHRW · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,330 of 2,394 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CHRW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Industrials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHRW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHRW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 3.9% | 3.8% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 5.4% | 7.0% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 5.2% | 3.7% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 10.4% | 50.5% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHRW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,330 | 3.6B CNY (≈$511M) | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score