Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ACI · against 121 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #108 of 122 · scores higher than 12% of peers · safety percentile 11
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ACI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ACI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 123 reported | 9.74× | 0.40× | 2% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 119 reported | 0.23 | 0.33 | 65% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 116 reported | 0.84× | 1.56× | 12% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 3 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 4 | 37.3B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 104 | 4.9B USD | 13 | 64 | |
| 105 | 35.0B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 12 | 13 | |
| 106 | 4.1B USD | 12 | 42 | |
| 107 | 7.6B USD | 11 | 43 | |
| 108 | 6.4B USD | 11 | 29 | |
| 109 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 9 | 36 | |
| 110 | 7.5B USD | 9 | 43 | |
| 111 | 2.7B GBP (≈$3.5B) | 8 | 17 | |
| 112 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.7B) | 7 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score