Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Acco Brands Corporation
How Acco Brands Corporation stacks up
ACCO · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
33/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #347 of 446 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including ACCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 85% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -5.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: -0.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 25.1% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | -0.6% | 8.4% | 16% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 25.1% | 9.2% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | -5.8% | 5.2% | 10% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 339 | 6.6B USD | 34 | 52 | |
| 339 | 613M USD | 34 | ||
| 339 | 441M USD | 34 | 45 | |
| 339 | 8.0B USD | 34 | 48 | |
| 347 | 479M USD | 33 | 42 | |
| 347 | 10.4B USD | 33 | 48 | |
| 347 | 410M USD | 33 | 24 | |
| 347 | 1.5B USD | 33 | 61 | |
| 347 | 4.6B USD | 33 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score